Mike Doman is Of Counsel in Quinn Emanuel’s Washington, DC office. His practice focuses on intellectual property litigation, with a particular emphasis on Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”). Over the past decade, Mike has appeared before the ITC in over forty Section 337 investigations, representing complainants, respondents, and third parties. Mike has also represented clients in intellectual property litigation before U.S. District Courts.
Mike has been recognized multiple times by the Legal 500 in the field of Section 337 litigation and has been named a “Rising Star” by Managing IP. Patexia consistently ranks Mike among the most active and best performing attorneys at the ITC. Mike is the former Chair of the ITC Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Intellectual Property Law and is also an elected member of the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation, a global honorary society of attorneys. Prior to joining the firm, Mike worked at a Washington, DC-based boutique law firm, where he focused on Section 337 investigations.
- Samsung
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
- GoPro
- Bobcat Company
- Zebra Technologies
- Hesai Group
- Qualcomm
- Certain Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Modules and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1378 (ITC 2025). Representing complainant Samsung Display in a trade secret-based investigation against BOE Technology.
- Certain Foreign-Fabricated Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1443 (ITC 2025). Defending respondent Taiwan Semiconductor Company (TSMC) in a patent-based investigation.
- Certain Cameras, Camera Systems, and Accessories Used Therewith, Inv. No. 337-TA-1400 (ITC 2025). Representing complainant GoPro, Inc. in a patent-based investigation against Insta360.
- Certain Skid-Steer Loaders, Compact Track Loaders, Excavators, Wheel Loaders, Dozers, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-3860 (ITC 2025). Representing complainant Bobcat Company in a patent-based investigation against Caterpillar.
- American University, Washington College of Law
(J.D., 2014) - Pennsylvania State University
(B.S., Life Science, 2011)
- The District of Columbia Bar
- The Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
- Legal 500, Patent Litigation (International Trade Commission), 2020-2022
- Managing IP, Rising Stars, 2021-2025
- ITC Is Split On Domestic Industry Analysis, Law360, December 1, 2021.
- Commission Opinion Implicates Public Interest Strategy, AMS Insights Blog, June 3, 2020.
- ITC False Ad Decision Shows Breadth of Section 337, Law360, March 28, 2017.
- Avoiding Spoliation and Sanctions: Recent USITC Decision Highlights Risk of Inaction, Financier Worldwide, December 2015.
- European Court of Justice Ruling Adds to Challenges that U.S. Standard-Essential Patent Holders Face on Enforcement, Washington Legal Foundation, Legal Pulse, September 1, 2015.
- Revival of the Public Interest: The Importance of Understanding the New Role of the Statutory Public Interest Factors in Section 337 Investigations, 337 Reporter, 2014 Summer Associate Edition, August 1, 2014.
- ITC Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Intellectual Property Law
- Fellows of the American Bar Foundation